Login or Register to rate and discuss movies   Member Benefits  Find Movies
Latest Updates
Movie Database
Character Battles
Random Musings
Forum Discussions
Contact Us
0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z
BLOOD FEAST
1963 / Horror
 Movie Trailer
 Preview Clip
 Discussions
 Extra Content
8.0 / 10
Rate This Movie
Add To Watchlist
Podcast Request
Directed by Herschell Gordon Lewis
Written by Allison Louise Downe
Starring William Kerwin, Mal Arnold, Connie Mason, Lyn Bolton, Scott H. Hall and Christy Foushee

An Egyptian caterer kills various women in suburban Miami to use their body parts to bring to life a dormant Egyptian goddess, while an inept police detective tries to track him down.

The following tags are associated with this movie: splatter, gore
Blood Feast (1963)
Review by Michael Mahoney

8 / 10
H.G. Lewis' first splatter flick is a trashy, stilted, and overall, a rather awful film. And I love every second of it.

The gore isn't as heavy here as it is in later films of his (such as The Wizard of Gore, a personal favorite of mine), but for the 1960's, the gore is rather shocking, and it helps that the film's in color (which wasn't a given during this tumultuous time period), giving the murder sequences additional good effect.

The story itself feels stagy, and the performances mostly stilted. William Kerwin (who has appeared in a bunch of later horror films, such as Two Thousand Maniacs!, A Taste of Blood, God's Bloody Acre, The Shadow of Chikara, and Whiskey Mountain) was very generic in his role, and had little character. His girlfriend, played by Connie Mason (who was also in Two Thousand Maniacs!), was little better.

Mal Arnold was ridiculous as Faud Ramses, and was overly hammy, which was sort of charming. Kudos mostly go to Gene Courtier, though, who gave one of the worst performances I've ever seen in a film. These performances led to, as I said, a more stagy feel, which was amplified by the very cheap look of the sets in the film. It wasn't necessarily a terrible thing, but it definitely stuck out.

The first of the 'Blood Trilogy' (followed by Two Thousand Maniacs! and Color Me Blood Red in 1964 and 1965), Blood Feast isn't a great movie, or even a good one. The effects, as gory as they are, look pretty bad, even by contemporary standards. The acting is pretty terrible, and the plot's paper-thin. Given all of this, though, Blood Feast is still a classic in many ways. It had a lot of heart, and pretty graphic imagery for the time. H.G. Lewis improves with his follow-up to the trilogy, but Blood Feast alone is moderately compelling, if you don't mind some shoddy film-making. 7.5/10 (rounded up to 8/10 to fit site's format).
Other gore movies that you may enjoy


The Midnight Meat Train (2008)


Baby Blood (1990)


2019: After the Fall of New York (1983)


Cut and Run (1985)




This site contains language and images which may not be suitable for persons under the age of 18.
All promotional art & images used on this site are copyrighted by their respective owners.